Trump’s Aggression Toward Venezuela Should Be Setting Off Alarm Bells

It’s looking a lot like the run-up to the Iraq war — only this time, the allegations are even more bogus and easily disproven.

Trump on December 1, 2025 -- public domain image

By Farrah Hassen

President Trump promised “no new wars,” but his aggression against Venezuela is the exact opposite.

The U.S. military has been blowing up alleged “drug boats” near Venezuela that have killed at least 83 people. The UN has condemned these unprovoked strikes as unlawful extrajudicial executions. Yet President Trump has said the U.S. may “very soon” expand this campaign to Venezuelan territory.

Meanwhile, the USS Gerald R. Ford is stationed off the coast of Venezuela and Trump has ordered the CIA to conduct covert operations inside the country. And he declared on November 29 that the airspace “above and surrounding” Venezuela is “to be closed in its entirety.”

It’s unclear if that means Trump plans to impose a no-fly zone on Venezuela. But if so, that would be an act of war — and under the Constitution, illegal without congressional authorization.

We saw this playbook before the 2003 invasion of Iraq. President George W. Bush lied about Iraq’s possession of weapons of destruction and its ties to Al Qaeda in order to sell his regime change war to the American public.

Similarly, the Trump administration is relying on unsupported allegations against Venezuela. Only this time, the allegations are even more bogus and easily disproven.

The U.S. has claimed that it attacked the small boats because they were carrying drugs, despite offering no proof. Even if the boats did carry drugs, the appropriate response would be to lawfully intercept and detain the suspects and afford them due process of law.

Under international law, force is only permitted in self-defense from an armed attack or if authorized by the UN Security Council, neither of which applies here. Congress hasn’t approved military force against alleged traffickers either.

A secret Department of Justice memo has gone so far as to name fentanyl as a “chemical weapon threat” from these “drug boats.” But neither U.S. nor international assessments have found that Venezuela is a primary producer or international shipment point of narcotics, including fentanyl.

Trump has also accused Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro of controlling the Tren de Aragua criminal gang, a claim contradicted by a U.S. intelligence memo, as well as the “Cartel of the Suns” — an organization many experts doubt even exists but which Trump’s State Department now lists as a “terrorist organization.”

And while Trump alleges that Maduro is flooding the U.S. with drugs, he just pardoned one of the biggest cocaine traffickers — former Honduran president Juan Orlando Hernández, who was sentenced to 45 years last year for creating “a cocaine superhighway to the United States.”

Trump’s pressure campaign against Venezuela isn’t about countering traffickers or “bringing democracy” to Venezuela.

Instead, it’s a continuation of treating Latin America as part of the U.S. “sphere of influence” to justify interventions, as seen with past CIA-orchestrated coups in Guatemala and Chile that ousted democratically elected governments in favor of more U.S.-compliant authoritarian regimes.

The U.S. has been waging economic warfare since 2005 by imposing a range of sanctions on Venezuela under the guise of “promoting democracy.” But far from resolving the country’s political crisis, these sanctions have devastated the economy and increased the suffering of ordinary Venezuelans, forcing nearly 8 million to flee since 2014.

Venezuela also has the world’s largest proven oil reserves — something Trump knows well. “When I left” office in 2021, “Venezuela was ready to collapse,” Trump said in 2023. “We would have taken it over — we would have gotten all that oil.”

Regardless of the reasons, the U.S. has no right to intervene in Venezuela. A war would unleash untold suffering on the Venezuelan people. It’s also the last thing Americans want, as several polls have shown. A November CBS/YouGov poll found that 70 percent of Americans across party lines oppose the U.S. taking military action against Venezuela.

The evidence is clear. There’s no legal basis for a war and the majority of Americans don’t want it.

OtherWords columnist Farrah Hassen, J.D., is a writer, policy analyst, and educator. This op-ed was distributed by OtherWords.org